A Note on "February"
I love James Schuyler’s poetry, its effortlessness and grace, its sound, its thick and at times gnarly descriptions. A palpable sense of irreality is everywhere present in it. His poems combine the attention of an ethnographic account with the charm of a great dinner guest. Add to this a private reading of the physical world imprinted on his nervous system. In his hyper-real descriptions colors shift; the words shimmer. The “violet sea” verges on the violent, there’s a deeper cold behind the “gold and chilly” weather.
In one sense “February” is composed as a painstakingly specific catalog of discrete images. Each line is a surprise, delighting in the pleasures of coincidence, like “the pink of five tulips/ at five p.m.” Gradually we progress through the city day to the dust inside the tulip, to the shape of the tulip, the container the tulip is in (a glass), and the container the glass is in (this day). The poem draws us from
1) the impalpability of the discrete units of matter; the fuzz of memory; the microscopic material of being; the “dust” inside the tulip;
“February” is not a tranquil Romantic recollection; it is active observation that creates the effect of recollection. As David Kalstone has said, Schuyler “exchanges a syntax of memory and judgment for a syntax of simultaneity. He uncouples his sentences, so that the electric spark must jump from noun to noun, and from event to event, no matter how disparate or seemingly unrelated.” The gaps between his lines give us the experience of the passage of time, a verbal time-lapse photography. Schuyler is a watcher. If you look out the window long enough you can actually “see” time pass as the light and colors of the world shift. In the first poem of his first book, John Ashbery wrote “Everything has a schedule, if you can find out what it is.” And one might say that in this poem “February” (the second poem of Schuyler’s first book, Freely Espousing), he does the work to disclose this invisible schedule, revealing the seemingly random syntax of the physical world.
This world as he presents it is both reassuring and unstable. The “day before March 1st” is not always February 28th and by not naming it—but naming what is next to it—he draws attention to this hinge of seasonal, temporal change, this “leap.” The poem is partly about this passage, getting over the hump of winter, as the truck disappears over the hump of the hill, or the speaker “can’t get over” his latest observation. And in this simple gesture nature, commerce, and human reason are intertwined. It is this interconnectedness that makes Schuyler’s poems reassuring in spite of the instability of their surface. And yet, reality is never as real as it is in a Schuyler poem. One has the sense of events and words being brought together out of necessity, to conduct a vision, giving the apparent randomness of living a sense of coherence and even inevitability.
Peter Gizzi, 2002
Dark Horses: Poets on Overlooked Poems
February, by James Schuyler